Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.3 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 4.0 |
| 2015-04-23 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.44 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.9 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3120mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 5.12 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket has a general score of 71.5, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 4i's 66.3 global score. Galaxy S III Cricket is a just a bit thicker and a little heavier phone than Xiaomi Mi 4i. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S III Cricket has an older 4.0 version and Xiaomi Mi 4i has Android 5.0.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Mi 4i, and although they both have 2 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket also has a larger number of cores and an extra GPU. The Xiaomi Mi 4i has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a little bigger screen, a higher display density and a lot better resolution of 1920 x 1080.
The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 4i, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy S III Cricket also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 64 GB. The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 4i, although it has a camera with way less megapixels and a lot smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photos and/or video in low light situations.
The Xiaomi Mi 4i features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has 3120mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.