Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.4 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2017-03-03 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Pink | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 218.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Xiaomi Surge S1 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP4 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2860mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a score of 85.3, which is better than Xiaomi Mi 5c's overall score of 72.4. Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is much newer than Xiaomi Mi 5c, it's notably heavier and thicker. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Xiaomi Mi 5c works with Android 7.1 Nougat operating system.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max features a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has a higher resolution of 1242 x 2688px, a little bit higher screen pixels density and a bigger screen. The iPhone 11 Pro Max and Xiaomi Mi 5c count with very similar storage to store more games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal storage.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because although it has 2 less processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor and a higher amount of RAM. IPhone 11 Pro Max takes better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5c, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same resolution back facing camera, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also has a larger aperture and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has a 39% larger battery size.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Mi 5c, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi 5c. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Mi 5c, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.