Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-03-03 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.28 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Pink | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 218.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Xiaomi Surge S1 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP4 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2860mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 5c, with an 88.1 score against 72.4. IPhone X is an a little thicker and notably heavier phone than Xiaomi Mi 5c. Apple iPhone X features a more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone X features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has a bit bigger screen, a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a just a bit greater pixel density. IPhone X counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Apple iPhone X features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 5c, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Apple iPhone X also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in low light situations.
The Xiaomi Mi 5c features just a little better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has 2860mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Mi 5c, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Mi 5c. If you want to save some money, you can get the Xiaomi Mi 5c, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.