Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-03-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.28 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Pink | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 218.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Xiaomi Surge S1 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2860mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi 5c's score of 72.4. Google Pixel 3's design is newer, but a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than Xiaomi Mi 5c. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Mi 5c, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has a just a little better pixels density, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a bit larger display. Google Pixel 3 counts with as much storage to install games and applications as the Xiaomi Mi 5c one, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 and Xiaomi Mi 5c feature similar batteries, although the Google Pixel 3 also has a 2% greater battery capacity. Google Pixel 3 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5c, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 3 also has a bigger camera aperture and a more mega pixels camera in the back.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3 is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.