Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-03 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.28 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Pink | Just black |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 218.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Xiaomi Surge S1 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP4 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2860mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 5c, getting a score of 82.9 against 72.4. Google Pixel 4a is a notably newer cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi 5c, although it's somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a has 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 5c has Android 7.1 Nougat.
The Google Pixel 4a has a bit better processor than Xiaomi Mi 5c, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a features just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has a little better pixel density, a little bit bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4a captures a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5c, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 4a also has a lot larger aperture and a back camera with more megapixels.
The Google Pixel 4a has a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has a 10 percent more battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Mi 5c, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.