Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-03 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.28 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Pink | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 218.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Xiaomi Surge S1 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP4 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2860mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 5c, with a global score of 98.9 against 72.4. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while Xiaomi Mi 5c has Android 7.1 Nougat version. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is a lot newer than Xiaomi Mi 5c's, although it's thicker and noticeably heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Mi 5c, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has a much bigger display, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little higher pixels amount per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has a bigger aperture, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with lot more megapixels. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2860mAh.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way more expensive than Xiaomi Mi 5c, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.