Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-03 | -- |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 4.76 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and Pink | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 218.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Xiaomi Surge S1 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP4 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2860mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 5c, with a general score of 82.6 against 72.4. Galaxy S25's body is incredibly lighter and a lot thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 5c. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 has older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 5c has Android 7.1 Nougat. The Xiaomi Mi 5c has a much greater performance than Galaxy S25, although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because although it has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Galaxy S25 shoots greater videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger camera aperture and a back camera with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S25 has a way better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Mi 5c, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Mi 5c. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi 5c, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.