Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-03 | -- |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 4.76 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and Pink | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 218.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Xiaomi Surge S1 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP4 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2860mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi 5c, having a 90.7 score against 72.4. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is a lot thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Mi 5c. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 Ultra has older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 5c has Android 7.1 Nougat version.
Xiaomi Mi 5c counts with a much greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 9 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has a just a little higher pixels density, a really larger screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots greater videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has a lot more MP camera in the back, a lot larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and videos and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.