Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-03-03 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Pink | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| $ 218.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Xiaomi Surge S1 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2860mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than Xiaomi Mi 5c, getting a global score of 80.1 against 72.4. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's construction is incredibly newer, but noticeably thicker and a lot heavier than Xiaomi Mi 5c. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version while Xiaomi Mi 5c has Android 7.1 Nougat version, providing you a couple additional features.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little faster processor than Xiaomi Mi 5c, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 5c, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi 5c shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture, and they both have a same resolution camera, the Xiaomi Mi 5c also counts with a way better (4K) video definition.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 5c, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2860mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi 5c, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi 5c. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Xiaomi Mi 5c, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.