Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-29 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.09 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver | Cyber shade |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus has an overall score of 78.1, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus's design is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus has the previous 6.0 Marshmallow version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus has a bit sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel density. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more processing cores.
The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots greater photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger aperture. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 5s Plus, because it has a 32 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.