Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| 2017-04-28 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is better than the Xiaomi Mi 6, with an 88.1 score against 76.5. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, we must tell that it's also just a bit thicker and a little heavier. Apple iPhone X features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a little higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution, a little bit more brightness, a quite larger display and a just a bit higher pixels amount per inch of display.
IPhone X has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Apple iPhone X features a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Xiaomi Mi 6 has better battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 23 percent more battery size. The iPhone X takes a little bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video definition and the same resolution back-facing camera, the iPhone X also counts with faster video frame rate.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Mi 6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Mi 6. So if you need that extra features, you can buy iPhone X, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Mi 6, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.