Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| 2017-04-28 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra has a global score of 77, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 6's 76.5 global score. Despite being the best in this comparison, HTC U Ultra is a just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone than Xiaomi Mi 6. The Xiaomi Mi 6 has a little sharper screen than HTC U Ultra, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, a quite smaller screen and a just a little worse pixel amount per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Mi 6 features a little bit better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. HTC U Ultra has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 mega-pixels, the same (4K) video resolution, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the HTC U Ultra also has a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
HTC U Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi 6 counts with just a bit better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3350mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Mi 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Mi 6. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Mi 6, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.