Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | HTC |
| 2017-04-28 | 2017-05-18 |
| 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 has a score of 77.6, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 6's 76.5 score. The HTC U11 is a better device than the Xiaomi Mi 6, it must be told that it's also a little bit heavier and a little thicker. HTC U11 has a screen that is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi 6 one, although the HTC U11 also has more pixels per screen inch, a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a little bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Mi 6 has just a bit more memory for games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 6 counts with a little faster processor than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi 6 also has more RAM.
HTC U11 counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have a camera with a 12 MP, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the HTC U11 also has a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations and a bigger sensor.
The Xiaomi Mi 6 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than HTC U11, because it has 3350mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, HTC U11 is also by far the cheapest, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.