Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-04-28 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi 6, with a global score of 97.6 against 76.5. Samsung Galaxy Fold is a newer and a bit thinner device than the Xiaomi Mi 6, but it is also noticeably heavier. The Xiaomi Mi 6 counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher count of pixels in each screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy Fold also has a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, higher video frame rate and a bigger aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy Fold has greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a 4380mAh battery size instead of 3350mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Mi 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi 6. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Mi 6, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.