Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-04-28 | -- |
| 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi 6's overall score of 76.5. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much lighter and incredibly thinner device than Xiaomi Mi 6. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a little more pixels per screen inch, a much better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a much larger screen and a way brighter screen.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 6 has a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and video, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much more megapixels back camera.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a 49% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.