Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-04-28 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 6, having an 80.1 score against 76.5. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a incredibly newer cellphone than Xiaomi Mi 6, although it's much thicker and incredibly heavier. Xiaomi Mi 6 and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro feature extremely similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. Xiaomi Mi 6 shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier sensor and a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have a 12 MP back-facing camera, the Xiaomi Mi 6 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Mi 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi 6. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Mi 6, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.