Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-28 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 6, having a general score of 81 against 76.5. Although the Galaxy XCover Pro is incredibly newer than the Xiaomi Mi 6, it's way thicker and a lot heavier. The Xiaomi Mi 6 has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 6 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 6 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better count of pixels in each display inch. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bigger storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 3350mAh. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has a much smaller camera sensor providing a way lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy XCover Pro and the Xiaomi Mi 6 cost the same, making it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.