Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-28 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 6's general score of 76.5. The Galaxy Z Flip is a noticeably newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi 6, but it is also a little heavier. Xiaomi Mi 6 features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a just a bit worse display density, a much smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip takes slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 6, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and higher video frame rates.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi 6 counts with a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 3350mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Mi 6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Mi 6. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Mi 6, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.