Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-04-28 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 6, getting a general score of 81.1 against 76.5. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is incredibly newer than Xiaomi Mi 6, it is somewhat thicker and heavier. Xiaomi Mi 6 has a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher screen density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 6 features a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. They have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way more MP camera in the back and a way larger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.