Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.16 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3350mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite, with a score of 79.3 against 77.7. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a just a little bit heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite, but they are 0.3inches thick. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version and Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. Galaxy Note 5 has a much better screen than Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Galaxy Note 5 captures a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 5 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 16 MP resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite has much more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 3350mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.