Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.16 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3350mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite, getting a general score of 81 against 77.7. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro design is notably heavier and noticeably thicker than the Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a CPU that's very similar to the processing unit in Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy XCover Pro and Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite both count with really similar screens, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a little better screen pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, they both have a same size display.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a better memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite features a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video and a camera in the back with a lot lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way larger sensor and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.