Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-08 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.80 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Red | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2244 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 422 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3120mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than the Xiaomi Mi 8 SE's 75.9 overall score. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 operating system, and Xiaomi Mi 8 SE has Android operating system. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is way newer than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE's, but it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, because although it has a little bit worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, way more brightness and a little bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 8 SE features a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3120mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a greater camera than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better video frame rate, a larger aperture, a way larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.