Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-06-05 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.10 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2248 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 56.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 8 is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a score of 83.3 against 80.1. Xiaomi Mi 8's construction is extremely thinner and noticeably lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, despite of the fact that it was released about 22 months before. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 8 has the previous 10 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 8, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher display density. Xiaomi Mi 8 has more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Mi 8 features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi 8 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 8, because it has a 32% bigger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 8 features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light images, and they both have a 0.39 inches sensor and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Xiaomi Mi 8 also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.