Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-04-15 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, having an 85.3 score against 81.4. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also a a little thicker and a lot heavier cellphone. IPhone 11 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, and Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
IPhone 11 Pro Max features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a quite greater quantity of pixels per screen inch, a brighter screen, a little bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1242 x 2688px. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a quite better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE shoots better pictures and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a much larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures and a back camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 29 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.