Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-15 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's general score of 81.4. Even being the best we are comparing, the Google Pixel 4 XL design is a bit thicker and heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. Google Pixel 4 XL has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 6 GB RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little bit better display than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, a quite bigger display and a quite greater pixel density. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 21% more battery size. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a much bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.