Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-15 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, with a overall score of 87.5 against 81.4. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is newer, but a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE.
Google Pixel 4a 5G and Xiaomi Mi 9 SE count with quite similar processors, both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE and the Google Pixel 4a 5G count with incredibly similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, they have the same internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 3885mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.