Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-15 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's score of 81.4. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a lot newer than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, it is somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version and Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel number per inch of display, it also counts with a much brighter display, a bit larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots slightly better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger camera aperture for better captures and video in low-light situations, faster 60 fps video frame rate, a back facing camera with a higher resolution and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.