Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-15 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is slightly better than Motorola One Hyper, having a overall score of 81.4 against 79.8. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version, so it gives you lots of additional features and some performance improvements. Although the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE and the Motorola One Hyper were released with only a couple months difference, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is thinner and lighter.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a quite higher display density. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has just a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot less mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper has better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.