Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-04-15 | -- |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.47 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, getting a overall score of 82.9 against 81.4. The Galaxy A34 construction is lighter and incredibly thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A34 has the older 13 version and Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy A34 counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A34. They have the same resolution camera in the back, a same size aperture and a same size back-facing camera sensor. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A34, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A34 has a much longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 63% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.