Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-15 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, having an 83.8 score against 81.4. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy A50 design is a little heavier and a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a just a bit better pixel count per inch in the screen. Galaxy A50 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 30% greater battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE takes better photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, it also counts with a much higher video definition, a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.