Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-15 | -- |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 5.47 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, getting an 82.6 score against 81.4. Galaxy S25 is a much lighter and much thinner device than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S25 counts with a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixels count per display inch, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a little larger display and much more display brightness. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25's storage capacity for games and applications is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE one, both have equal internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a back-facing camera with more megapixels, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy S25 counts with greater battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.