Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-04-15 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 430 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a score of 81.4, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 overall score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is older than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's body is lighter and way thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a really longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.