Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-15 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 430 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has an overall score of 81.4, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's score of 81. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11, so it gives some extra features. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE body is incredibly thinner and much lighter than Galaxy XCover Pro, despite of the fact that it was released only 10 months before.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a quite greater pixel count in each screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and videos and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.