Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-15 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, having a global score of 92.3 against 81.4. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is heavier than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, it's a bit thinner and newer. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.