Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.4 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-15 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 430 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3070mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's 81.4 score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 body is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's, although it is heavier.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a little bit better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way smaller display and a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little higher display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a really longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3070mAh.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger diafragm aperture and a back-facing camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.