Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-06 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Purple | Ocean |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting an 83.2 score against 83.1. The Xiaomi Mi 9 design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, although it was released just 14 months before. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels, a quite bigger display and a brighter screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has a 4260mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh. OPPO Find X2 Pro's camera is just as good as the camera in Xiaomi Mi 9, and although the OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos and a bigger diafragm aperture, they both have a camera in the back with a 48 MP resolution, the same video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.