Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-06 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Purple | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 9's general score of 83.2. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold and Xiaomi Mi 9 were released only 7 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Fold design is incredibly heavier but also just a little thinner. Xiaomi Mi 9 counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels in each display inch.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9 also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a much larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
Galaxy Fold features better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.