Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-06 | -- |
| 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.10 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Purple | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9's 83.2 general score. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a noticeably lighter and noticeably thinner device than Xiaomi Mi 9. The Xiaomi Mi 9 counts with a much greater performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has way more brightness, a bit larger display, a better 1440 x 3088px resolution and a little higher display pixels density. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor, a lot more megapixels back facing camera, a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.