Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-06 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Purple | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, with an 83.2 score against 77.6. Although Xiaomi Mi 9 is noticeably older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's construction is thinner and much lighter. Xiaomi Mi 9 counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 6 GB RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 has a sharper display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little greater pixels quantity per display inch. Xiaomi Mi 9 captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a less MP back-facing camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a very superior memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.