Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-03-06 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Purple | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 has a score of 83.2, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. The Xiaomi Mi 9 body is noticeably thinner and noticeably lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though it was released just 13 months before. The Xiaomi Mi 9 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi 9, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better screen pixels density. The Xiaomi Mi 9 features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution, a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has a 36% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.