Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-06 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Purple | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro, having a global score of 83.2 against 81. Xiaomi Mi 9 is an older cellphone than the Galaxy XCover Pro, but Xiaomi was able to make it a lot thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. The Xiaomi Mi 9 features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi 9 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 9 counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Xiaomi Mi 9 also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Xiaomi Mi 9 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light captures, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos and a lot better video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has more storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover Pro features better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.