Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's overall score of 82.7. The Apple iPhone X body is thinner and just a little lighter than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, even though it was released about 22 months before. Apple iPhone X features a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 3 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone X features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436px resolution, a brighter display and a just a little higher pixels amount in each inch in the display. IPhone X has a much better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than iPhone X, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a very superior battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 47 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.