Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, with a global score of 84.2 against 82.7. The Apple iPhone XS is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, but Apple made it thinner and a little bit lighter anyway. Apple iPhone XS features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution, a brighter display and a just a bit higher pixel amount per inch of screen.
The iPhone XS has a bit better processor than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a better camera than iPhone XS, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a much better storage for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a really longer battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.