Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is just a bit better than Google Pixel, having a global score of 82.7 against 80.2. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro construction is notably newer, but just a little bit thicker and much heavier than the Google Pixel. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a very superior camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a larger camera aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations, higher 60 fps video frame rate, a larger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a much higher resolution camera.
The Google Pixel has as much memory for games and applications as Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, both have equal 128 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.