Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a global score of 82.7, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 global score. These phones have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an older 10 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11. Even being the best in this comparison review, we must tell that it is also a heavier and just a little thicker device.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a little greater pixels density, a little larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a way higher resolution back facing camera, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.