Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4's 81.9 global score. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro body is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Google Pixel 4. The Google Pixel 4's processor is very similar to Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's processing unit, they have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro count with very similar displays, because although the Google Pixel 4 has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, better video frame rate and a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.