Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, getting a overall score of 82.9 against 82.7. Even though the Google Pixel 4 XL and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro were released only 2 months apart, Google Pixel 4 XL's construction is a bit thinner but also just a bit heavier. Google Pixel 4 XL's processing unit is just as good as Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's processor, both of them have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an 8% more battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, higher video frame rates and a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.