Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, having a overall score of 82.9 against 82.7. Google Pixel 4a's body is newer, extremely lighter and a little thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit better display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a little larger display. Google Pixel 4a's memory for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 4a. They have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with better video frame rate, a much larger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a camera in the back with much more MP.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.