Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, getting an 87.5 score against 82.7. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is newer, somewhat lighter and a little thinner than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has Android 10 version.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit inferior pixels quantity in each screen inch, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a bit larger display. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G. They have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro and the Google Pixel 4a 5G feature similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, they have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a way more megapixels back camera.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.