Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has an overall score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than Moto G Power's 76.1 global score. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has older 10 version while Moto G Power has Android 11 version. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a just a little thinner and a bit lighter cellphone than the Moto G Power, although both of them were released only 8 months apart.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little bit better looking display than Moto G Power, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit better processor than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has more RAM.
The Moto G Power features more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a much better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos, a camera in the back with a much better resolution and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Moto G Power counts with superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.